The atomic bomb mentioned in the Dialogues with the Angel a year and a half before Hiroshima

05/08/2015

On 11 February 1944, through the mouth of Hanna Dallos, "He who shines" said: Atomic explosion! (*) The man - stupid child - who tears everything to pieces, will be disappointed, ... Continue reading "La bombe atomique évoquée dans les Dialogues avec l’ange un an et demi avant Hiroshima"

On February 11, 1944, through the mouth of Hanna Dallos, "He who shines" says:

Atomic Blast! (*)
The man - stupid child -
who tears everything to pieces, will be disappointed,
for HE cannot be divided.
what is divisible,
is inert force and strong matter.
(Talking with Angels, interview 34 with Gitta, p. 206)

In two sentences, he announces the atomic bombs which will hit Japan twice in August 1945, killing more than 100,000 people and astounding world opinion, which did not suspect the existence of such a weapon. So the newspaper The world he wondered in an article in his edition of August 8, 1945: What could the atomic bomb be?

Hiroshima après l'explosion atomique du 6 août 1945 (Source : Wikipedia)

Hiroshima after the atomic explosion on 6 August 1945 (Source: Wikipedia)

If the author of the article had known about the word of the angel, he would have found clues there to answer the question. It talks about division, and that's precisely what nuclear fission is: uranium atoms are literally broken in two. And going back a few lines, he found another clue, this time to the origin of the monstrous energy released by the explosion:

- There's nothing more blind than force!
Force is matter. Matter is force.
(…)
Radiation becomes matter,
matter becomes radiation.

By dividing, the uranium nucleus indeed loses a little mass which is transformed into a profusion of radiant energy, according to Einstein's famous formula E=mc2.

The bomb had been prepared in the greatest secrecy by the Americans as part of the Manhattan Project. Even if its principle had been known to physicists since 1939 and had been the subject of numerous scientific publications, it is unlikely that Hanna Dallos was aware of it, because she had no scientific training. Unless the Hungarian press echoed the intuition of his compatriot, the Jewish physicist Leo Szilard, who was the first to think that the atomic nucleus could be the site of chain reactions and filed a patent in England in 1936. Unlikely, because later, returning to this period, Szilard specifies that having read Liberating Destruction of HG Wells, he knew what a chain reaction meant and had not wanted his patent made public.

The prophetic character of interview 34, accredited by these few historical reminders, should not, however, eclipse the words that follow:

The multiple becomes ONE:
is the path that leads to HIM.
One loaf, many loaves,
it's no longer a miracle,
for the earth is full of bread!
Of the multitude of men: MAN.
This is the new miracle.
It's the new bread that satisfies every hunger,
because everyone will have it.
That's enough, because you can no longer grasp
the meaning of my words.

Are we, 70 years later, better able to grasp the meaning of these words? It's urgent !

EL

* Translation from Hungarian “atomrobbantás”